Trying to remember what I could recall about and also considering historical treatments of the 1970s, I came up with these four major issues that fit with some of the themes of this course:
Détente, 1969-1975 Détente was the big thing going internationally in the beginning of 1970. I am not sure who first used the term, but it is French and means a relaxing or easing of tensions--The Russians referred to it as the разрядка (razriadka). In the context of the Cold War, detente meant a lessening of tension between the USSR and the US and, to a lesser extent, between the US and communist China also. The culmination of detente occurred in 1972 with the signings of the SALT I treaty (see below), the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and the Biological Weapons Convention. In addition to the political achievements, detente also meant that all kinds of cultural exchanges began between Russia and the United States. For example, it became easier for historians to go to Russian to do research in Russian archives. Dance groups, orchestras, ballet troupes, youth groups came and went, back and forth, between the two countries. There were a number of reasons for the easing of Cold War hostilities:
President Nixon and his National Security Advisor Kissinger Leonid Brezhnev, General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union
The Unraveling of Détente Almost as soon as the spirit of detente filled the Cold War air, it began to dissipate. Looking back, there were a number of key events/factors leading to its demise.
It is kind of hard to believe, but the phrase "human rights" was little used in U.S. matters of foreign policy before the 1970s. True, it was in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and true American politicians often spoke of democracy in the world, but the Cold War was being fought by the US in terms of "as long as you are on our side, we don't really care about your country's human rights record or the state of democracy in your country." That changed when Jimmy Carter assumed the presidency in January 1977. In his inaugural address, he spoke: The world itself is now dominated by a new spirit. Peoples more numerous and more politically aware are craving and now demanding their place in the sun--not just for the benefit of their own physical condition, but for basic human rights. (Avalon Project) And, in another speech that year, President Carter noted we have reaffirmed America's commitment to human rights as a fundamental tenet of our foreign policy. In ancestry, religion, color, place of origin, and cultural background, we Americans are as diverse a nation as the world has even seen. No common mystique of blood or soil unites us. What draws us together, perhaps more than anything else, is a belief in human freedom. We want the world to know that our Nation stands for more than financial prosperity. (usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/55.htm) The idea of human rights as a driving force in foreign policy was a novel idea, and it lead Carter to a number of political policies--many of which were very unpopular at the time--such as his support for the Solidarity movement in communist Poland, his support for the end of apartheid in South Africa, the idea of normalizing relations with communist China, etc. But his desire to improve the human condition in the world was foremost seen in his mediation of the Camp David Accords between Israel and Egypt which brought the Near East, at the time, one step closer to a lasting peace settlement, which unfortunately has yet to materialize. Begin, Carter and Sadat at Camp David In the 1907s, there was one other major event that concerned human rights in the world, and that was the Helsinki Accords. Unfortunately the Accords were something that I recall as being little noticed in the United States at the time except to decry the treaty for its recognition of the Soviet Union's postwar territorial aggrandizements in Eastern and Central Europe. On 1 August 1975 the Helsinki Final Act of the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe was signed by the United States, Canada, the Soviet Union and the countries of Europe. Since there had been no general peace treaty signed after World War II, the act was seen as legally accomplishing what had, in fact, been done since 1945. While many commentators viewed the Helsinki Accords as a major "win" for the Soviet Union because of the clauses on the inviolability of national borders, which seemed to legalize Soviet territorial gains after World War II, there was something else in the Accords that proved very distasteful to communist and authoritarian regimes around the world. The Accords contained provisions for the "Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief" and "Equal rights and self-determination of peoples. Once the document was signed, independent non-governmental organizations (NGOs) arose throughout the world, but most prominently in the Soviet Union itself and throughout the communist countries of Eastern Europe, to monitor compliance with the Helsinki Accords and to ensure that basic human rights were not being infringed. Eventually many of these NGOs turned into the International Helsinki Federation and/or the Human Rights Watch. When I was at college way back in the 1970s, we were still working on mainframe computers; there were no PCs, no desktop workstations, no notebook computers--some of us did have electronic calculators while many of the professors still used slide rules. We also used keypunch machines to punch out our machine readable cards which then had to be compiled by a compiling machine so that the computer could run the program--I tried to explain this process to one of my classes, and all I got was blank stares. For a computer, we used a GA-30 machine, and we were using Fortran as our programming language. The process was unbelievably labor intensive, and if you couldn't type correctly, you had a lot of problem getting thing to run right because you were always going to make mistakes on the key punch machine. By the time I graduated, I know that the engineering school had put in a Burroughs machine that supported the use of individual, hard-wired workstations--no more key punch machines--but I never got to work on that. Here are just a few of the landmark dates, from the 1970s, in the development of the personal computer, which has so dramatically changed the world.
So which as the first personal computer? There is some disagreement, but here are three candidates. August 1977, Radio Shack announced the TRS-80 Model 1 microcomputer for $600, 4KB RAM, 4KB ROM, keyboard, black-and-white video display, and tape cassette. 1976, Commodore announced the PET (Personal Electronic Transactor), an all-in-one home computer, the PET. In 1977 Apple introduced the Apple II, its first popular microcomputer. It was a very successful personal computer. Japan and OPEC The world economy changed quite abruptly in the 1970s. The highly-industrialized economies of the United States, Great Britain and Western Europe--economies that had been built around the steel industry and associated heavy industries--fell apart as Japan emerged as the world's new economic powerhouse. Japan simply had newer, more efficient production facilities. I am not sure of the exact date, but I know by about 1975 that one of my friends was driving a Toyota corolla to school everyday. Through the decade, Toyota and Datsun established a very significant market share in an industry (automobiles) that had always been a symbol of US industrial might. Soon, Japan's economic powerhouse spread to other areas, such as electronics. One of the problems with many of the western economies was the failure to keep up and modernize with more advanced and efficient operations. For example, I recall that at Bethlehem Steel, one of the largest steel operations in the United States, most of the steel-making blast furnaces dated to the 1920s, while in Japan, the equipment was much newer and more efficient in terms of fuel usage and manpower required to run the operations. Another of the major factors that led to the economic shift in the 1970s was the impact of OPEC and the use of oil politics, particularly the oil embargo of 1973-74. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) actually goes back quite a way. It was created at the Baghdad Conference in September 1960 by Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. The five original members were later joined by nine other countries. To be polite, the organization functioned as a cartel to fix the price of oil to make sure that producing countries were making a lot of money. In 1973, the Arab countries of OPEC wielded oil as a political tool and ordered an embargo as part of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Here is a rough timeline of events.
Gas lines in the United States 1973-74 I remember the odd-even gas rationing that went on in Pennsylvania. If your car license plate ended with an odd number, then you could buy gas on odd days; same deal with even numbers. I am not sure anymore, but I think there was also a limit on how much gas you could purchase at a time--remember there were no "fuel efficient" cars around in 1973 so cars required a lot of gas--and this was only if a gas station had any gas to sell. As a result, very long car lines quickly developed around open gas stations. I do recall having to wait in block-long lines. Two things resulted from the gas crisis. First, this was a big impetus for the development of smaller, more fuel efficient cards (Toyota!). This was also circa the time that self-service gas stations started. Before this time, the gas station attendant always pumped your gas. But in an effort to cut costs a little bit, and lower the price of gas, stations did away with the attendants, and you now had to pump your own gas. The gas crisis helped to push many of the economies in the West over the edge. When suddenly costs of fuel rose very fast, many industries simply could not be competitive any more; particularly those industries which had not kept pace with modernizing their capital plant. For example, consider that in the US the price of oil quadrupled between 1973 and 1974. The stock market crashed and went nowhere for almost the entire decade. And finally, the rapid oil price rise started an inflationary trend that went largely unchecked through the 1970s and early 1980s. Television Well, I added television to the list, and true you could say that it was an important part of the 1950s or even the 1960s, especially given the impact of such things as the Kennedy-Nixon debates, and true, by the 1970s, there were television shows that many families in America were watching (just like in the 1950s):
But there was also something different about television in the 1970s. Here are some that came to my mind, listed in no particular order: The cultural phenomenon that was Monty Python 's Flying Circus, which was originally broadcast by the BBC from 1969 to 1974 (and then after 1975 in the US--usually late at night). When I was in high school, we were always talking about the latest episodes to be shown--I still recall the "Twit of the Year Contest" or the "Spam" skit and song. The troupe broke ground in all kinds of directions. I still often show the movie Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975) in my HIS 101 classes. The Super Bowl
went from being a barely-watched, championship game in a bizarrely
American sport, to becoming a worldwide cultural phenomenon by the end
of the decade. Much of that was due to the dynastic qualities of
the Pittsburgh Steelers. By 1970-71, images of the Vietnam War were on the nightly news of American television every night of the week--Contrast that to the situation in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2001 where little of that activity makes the evening news. Viewers could see every night the horror that was modern warfare. Thus, by the 1970s, television covered everything that was happening around the world, and broadcast that information around the world. In the summer of 1973 (May to August) the major television networks in the United States (ABC, NBC, CBS) began daily broadcasting of the US Senate's Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities which was investigating Richard Nixon and his staff for corruption and illegal activities. I still remember watching a lot of that and Senators Sam Ervin and Howard Baker questioning witnessed, and the testimony of John Dean. A lot of other Americans were watching too, gripped by the tale of corruption and criminal activity that emerged from the Nixon White House. By the end of the decade, there was a cable TV station, C-Span, that allowed Americans to actually watch what was going on in the US House of Representatives. Web pages within the course relevant to the 1970s
Some suggestions for further research |
This
page is copyright © 2007, C.T. Evans
For information contact cevans@nvcc.edu